Kaccāyana-Byākaraṇaṃ · chapter 4 of 8
Itthiyaṃ bhāsitapum’-itthī pumā ’va ce
In the feminine, if a feminine indicated masculine, [it should be regarded] as masculine.
- Kaccāyana 331
- Rūpasiddhi 353
- Saddanīti 714-5
- Samāsa-Kappa · Sattama-Kaṇḍa
Text and translation
Read in the chapter →331. 353. Itthiyaṃ bhāsitapum’-itthī pumā ’va ce (714-5)
Itthiyaṃ tulyādhikaraṇe pade ce bhāsitapumitthī pumā ’va daṭṭhabbā.
Dīghā jaṅghā yassa so ’yaṃ dīghajaṅgho; kalyāṇabhariyo; pahūtapañño.
Bhāsitapumeti kimatthaṃ? Brāhmaṇabandhu ca sā bhariyā cā ti brāhmaṇabandhubhariyā.
- Dīghā jaṅghā yassa so ’yaṃ dīghajaṅgho (the legs of that [man] are long; he is “dīghajaṅgho” [one who has long legs]).
- Kalyāṇā bhariyā yassa so ’yaṃ kalyāṇabhariyo ([one who has] a good wife).
- Pahūtā paññā yassa so ’yaṃ pahūtapañño ([one who has] much wisdom).
What is the purpose of saying “bhāsitapuma” (that indicated masculine)? To prevent the operation of this rule when it did not indicate masculine in the past: Brāhmaṇabandhu ca sā bhariyā cā ti brāhmaṇabandhubhariyā (a relative of the brahmin and she is a wife, so [she is called] a wife that is a relative of a brahmin).
Without the footnotes: they are on the chapter card.
Drafts
Ask about §331
Questions are asked from the analysis following Visuddhāyuṃ (draft): the answer uses this sutta's row and the project's sources. It is for enrolled students and requires signing in.
Pāḷi text and English translation by Bhikkhu Nandisena; edition, apparatus and glossary by the Instituto de Estudios Buddhistas Hispano (IEBH). This material may be reproduced for personal use and distributed free of charge. Copyright © 2026 IEBH. Published under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21948010.